Chesley B. “Sully” Sullenberger III is an amazing pilot-he managed to water land a cripple jet in the Hudson River without losing a single passenger. As such, he is a hero in the classic sense: someone who does something great through skill and courage.
Listening to the news coverage of the event, I was struck by how the news folks kept using the word “miracle” over and over to describe the landing. I found that this bothered me a bit. This was not because I had any doubts about the landing being an amazing and impressive accomplishment. Rather, I think that the news folk misuse the word “miracle.”
A miracle is an event that violates the normal laws of nature and is typically regarded as divine or supernatural. While landing a plane on a river is amazing, it is well within the laws of nature and involves no supernatural aspects. Rather, it involves a great deal of skill and some luck.
If the plane had been surrounded in a nimbus of divine light and gently set down upon the earth, then that would have been a miracle. Since nothing like that happened, it was not a miracle.
Yes, I’m being picky, but I think that words should be used properly. Yes, I am aware that words are a purely human creation and that their meaning is a matter of convention. So, one might say, if news folks and other people want to use “miracle” to describe an event that is impressive or amazing, then they should do so and I should simply accept that.
On one hand, I do see that as reasonable. After all, people should be free to use words as they see fit-accepting, of course, that other people might have no idea what they mean.
On the other hand, if “miracle” is used to describe anything that is impressive, then we will need a new word or phrase for miracles in the classic sense. Also, there is also the worry about sloppy thinking-that people will call events miracles and slide easily into seeing them as having a supernatural causal factor involved.
If the pilot were instantly given the power of Jr Jesus for just the landing would you think a miracle was involved then?
Here come the lawsuits in the news. Airline has a good enough pilot and thus their lives are saved due to an ‘act of god’ with birds causing the accident. If I were the airlines I would just hire bad pilots because dead people cannot sue. People are so ungrateful at times. The ‘goodness’ of the general public never ceases to amaze me. Now I need to figure out how to make a quick buck off of a good lawsuit.
Dead people can have living relatives who can sue.
I bet the percentage is less the more removed you get from the actual person.
…and some people have no surviving relatives. Some may have a spouse that was cheating on them and was glad they were dead to collect the insurance money. etc…